c2finds the dirt11/12 patches · january variant: 84.7 %fail
c3keeps its headingmax 1.59°/minpass
c4finishes the job0 stuck · longest 50 minpass
c5agreed places only3 of 3 on the listpass
variants
12 run · 2 refused
decided by
fixed checks; a model only flags
signed
in the sealed room, checkable offline
copies
buyer and robot maker, the same
verdictfail
hold the update
Why the update failed
Firmware 4.3.0 stays off a dark winter entrance mat. Your October floor would have passed it; the January variant did not. Your robots stay on 4.2.1, and the vendor gets the same receipt.
Live today
The sealed room, and receipts anyone can check offline
Next, with design partners
Robot firmware tests, and the variants an offline model writes
Would you check your next delivery in a sealed room before we accept it?
Hi,
Before we accept a delivery, we would like it checked against criteria we agree with you in advance: for example where the devices send data, known vulnerabilities, and signed firmware. Aarloven is building a way to check sealed samples against such criteria in a sealed room in Stockholm, with a named expert's signature on each receipt. We would both get the same copy.
We are joining its design-partner pilot. Would you take part?
The brief: https://aarloven.com
Aarloven